Covered Bonds - Banks

Share market related discussions

Covered Bonds - Banks

Postby benthonic » Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:47 pm

Australia’s four biggest banks may cut borrowing costs by as much as 40 percent selling covered bonds after European lenders pushed sales of the asset-backed debt to a record.

Westpac Banking Corp., Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. and National Australia Bank Ltd. may be able to issue three-year covered bonds priced to yield about 50 basis points more than the bank bill swap rate, less than the 85 basis-point spread on senior debt, according to Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc. Moody’s Investors Service estimates savings of 20 percent.

The Australian government will amend the law to let financiers issue the securities for the first time, Treasurer Wayne Swan said Dec. 12 as he announced an overhaul package aimed at spurring competition in the banking industry. Global sales of the securities, including Pfandbriefe, as they are known in Germany, have surged 33 percent to a record 329 billion euros ($435 billion) in 2010, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, as investors seek the relative safety of debt backed by both the issuer and an underlying pool of assets.

Covered bonds are “essential weapons as banks look for cheaper and more diversified sources of funding,” John Manning, a credit analyst at RBS in Sydney, said in a telephone interview. Even when global credit markets seized up, European banks “had good access to covered bond markets and were able to access the funding they required at quite commercially acceptable rates,” he said.

The securities typically get higher credit ratings and pay less interest because they’re backed by assets such as mortgages that stay on the lender’s balance sheet and can be sold in the event of a default. Australian lenders are barred from selling the securities because they conflict with local laws stating that depositors’ interests should come ahead of creditors.

Investors in Europe demand 178 basis points of extra yield to hold covered bonds instead of government debt, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s EMU Covered Bonds index. Spreads average 238 basis points, or 2.38 percentage points, on the region’s financial debt, a separate index shows.

Australia’s government will release draft amendments to the Banking Act to allow the sale of covered securities during the first sitting of Parliament next year, according to a federal document detailing the planned changes.

Allowing covered bonds will help “secure the long-term safety and sustainability” of Australia’s banking system, the document states. Treasury may impose a cap on the amount of covered bonds that each bank can sell, “for example five percent of an issuer’s total Australian assets,” it said.

Limiting sales to that amount would allow for about A$100 billion ($99 billion) of covered bond issuance in total, Sydney- based Deutsche Bank AG analysts Gus Medeiros and Colin Tan wrote in a report to clients yesterday.

The first sale of covered notes in New Zealand in June, a NZ$425 million ($319 million) offering by Bank of New Zealand, was priced at a 38 percent discount to what the nation’s banks would otherwise get, Moody’s said in a report at the time.

Cameron Clyne, chief executive officer of National Australia Bank, yesterday said his bank plans to sell A$28 billion of bonds in the year ending September 2011, and would be able to cut costs if some of that debt was covered securities.

Credit-default swaps protecting against a default on the senior debt of the four biggest lenders fell 2 basis points to 106 basis points as of 2:12 p.m. in Sydney, according to Nomura Holdings Inc. That’s the lowest in three weeks, according to prices from data provider CMA.

ANZ Bank shares dropped 0.8 percent to A$23.90 as of 2:04 p.m. in Sydney, while Commonwealth Bank fell 0.9 percent. Westpac rose 0.4 percent and National Australia Bank declined 0.7 percent.

Australia’s four biggest banks may need to raise as much as A$130 billion from selling bonds in 2011, with the majority issued in offshore markets, according to Nomura Australia Ltd. credit analyst Ben Byrne.

Until mid-2007, Australia’s banks were able to issue three- year debt at a spread of about 50 basis points more than government bonds, the Reserve Bank of Australia wrote in a Nov. 30 submission to a Senate inquiry into banking competition. The spread for domestic sales peaked at about 220 basis points amid the global credit freeze in late 2008 and is now about 120 basis points, according to the RBA.

“No one is sure how long bank funding costs will remain elevated,” Westpac wrote in its submission to the inquiry. “We expect those costs to eventually settle at a new equilibrium, lower than current levels, but certainly more expensive than before the crisis began.”

Being able to issue covered debt “would strengthen the banks’ funding positions as covered bonds provide access to a broader class of investors,” the lender stated.

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce raised A$750 million in October in the first sale of Australian dollar-denominated covered bonds since the start of the credit crisis in 2007. The Australian laws don’t block overseas banks issuing the notes.

The 5.75 percent notes due December 2013 were priced to yield 91.25 basis points more than similar-maturity government debt, according to a statement at the time. The spread has narrowed to 87 basis points, according to ANZ Bank prices on Bloomberg.

RBS’s Manning said his estimate of the costs for Australian banks issuing covered bonds was based on the CIBC sale.

Covered bonds will probably be about 20 percent cheaper for Australian banks to issue compared with senior unsecured debt, Jennifer Wu, a senior analyst at Moody’s, said in a phone interview yesterday.

Top-rated covered securities would help attract investors who bought AAA rated government-guaranteed bank debt under a program introduced after the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in 2008, according to Patrick Winsbury, Sydney- based senior vice president at Moody’s.

The major banks were the heaviest users of the program, and would benefit the most from being able to market debt with the highest ratings as they seek to refinance guaranteed bonds, Winsbury said in a phone interview yesterday.

Australia guaranteed A$144.9 billion of bank debt under the guarantee arrangement as of October, according to information on a federal website.

Lower-rated smaller Australian lenders are unlikely to benefit as much as the main banks from legislation allowing covered bonds, as it is “highly unlikely” they will be able to secure AAA credit ratings, said Mark Bayley, a Sydney-based credit strategist with advisory company Aquasia Ltd.

“A covered bond market is actually more likely to decrease competition within the Australian lending market,” he said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-1 ... e-ban.html
benthonic
 
Posts: 3866
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Covered Bonds - Banks

Postby benthonic » Fri Mar 25, 2011 8:41 am

looks like this is up
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/busines ... 6027716014

AUSTRALIA'S bank bosses have urged the government to take bolder steps to allow them to diversify their funding bases and ease cost pressures, following a decision to allow banks to issue covered bonds. Commonwealth Bank's chief executive Ralph Norris said the government's decision to limit covered bonds to 8 per cent of net assets, after initial suggestions of a 5 per cent limit, was a positive move.

Covered bonds are a form of debt backed by specific assets..... ....the bonds, which would be AAA-rated, would appeal to investors who bought Australian bank debt when it was covered by the government guarantee. "There are some investors who can only hold AAA-rated debt,"...
benthonic
 
Posts: 3866
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Covered Bonds - Banks

Postby benthonic » Sun Jan 15, 2012 9:01 pm

CBA plans covered bonds sale in Australia

Commonwealth Bank of Australia plans to sell covered bonds in the Australian market, following its maiden offering of covered bonds that raised 1.5 billion euro in Europe earlier this month.

The bank said today the issue was expected next week, marking the first covered bond issue by a top Australian bank in the local market.

CBA has mandated Citibank, HSBC, Westpac and its own institutional bank to arrange the offering.

Covered bonds are typically backed by residential mortgages that remain on the bank's books. Australia last year was among the last developed nation to allow banks to sell covered bonds to protect depositors, who have the first claim on assets.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/cba-plan ... z1jWTya3ma

the net effect of this is that, as the banks are allowed to hold (I think) either 8% or 10% of total capital in covered bonds, it may have the effect of driving down that cost of capital by approx, 40bp, or 0.4%. That is for that amount of money raised. IE another cheapish source of funds, and probably useful as the European lending markets withdraw capital / make it v. expensive for local financial instos to refinance maturing debt.

However, the scary bit is that other debt holders, any subordinated debt, are pushed further down the claim ladder and put in a riskier position (Bank Hybrids come to mind), and also your Govt, our Govt, has seen it in its wisdom to guarantee these Bonds. Having just re-read "The Ascent of Money" over the weekend, this could be dangerous for you and me, if (when) the financial engineers get their claws into the product and start slicing up the Bonds. That's what I think. Michael West has written, warned as to the inherent dangers in these sorts of products, but few others seem to worry. They are fine when they work in efficient markets, but it is more jiggery-pookery, more short term vs long term mismatching.
benthonic
 
Posts: 3866
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Covered Bonds - Banks

Postby Disco Stu » Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:58 am

I agree entirely Benthonic - essentially this change is only going to really benefit 4 people in Australia, the 4 CEO's of the big 4 and maybe a handful of underlyings and lickspittles that move within their sphere of influence. It will marginally reduce their funding costs, which in turn will make it easier for them to meet their NIM targets that form a large part of their bonus structures, all the while getting the Australian tax payer potentially further on the hook, in terms of contingent liabilities, both by guarranteeing these products and bailing out depositors in a future credit disaster should they start to fail.

By next year any benefit will have been absorbed by higher operating costs or higher funding costs anyhow... but that won't matter the CEO's will have achieved their targets by that stage anyhow, and this years bonuses will be in the bag - queue the retirement notices for at least two of them. None of the big 4 want to be the first to admit that the game has changed and the era of constant double digit earnings grown is history - in the meantime they're keen to use every 'jiggery-pookery"trick in the book to give the impression that it is being stretched out.
Disco Stu is leaving the building... he can sometimes be found at http://asxsharenerd.wikispaces.com/
Disco Stu
 
Posts: 905
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 4:30 pm
Location: Sydney




Return to General Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron