stonelover wrote:Judd,
I have wondered about the "prudent" and the self funded that rely on a healthy Interest Rate to give
them that essential boost. There are always 2 sides to the argument.
My view was that Business and Consumer Confidence was suffering, big-time. Contracting.
Also that the ripple effect across all of Aus (except the 1 in 50 Resources people) was going to be dramatic and long felt.
I also hold the view that Aus can strengthen itself over the long haul if it can keep feeding Business/Consumer with some oxygen.
Whilst there are billions of dollars worth of 'mining-related' projects on the table for years to come, so much of it is roads, bridges, tunnels, mining-camps, airstrips and all relying on positive projections of Asian productions.
There did not seem to be any fall-back position for Aus should Asian eceonomies start to contract.
I do agree with you to a large extent. I may add that I am heavily invested in the sharemarket (I think so but I haven't checked the pricing in quite a while) and fixed interest investment is a (very) small proportion.
I have no problems with business investing. None whatsoever. If I have a concern it is with the consumer. I don't give a toss about their confidence. Happy to see it shrink for a while so that they pay down personal debt and it is debt, overwhelming debt, which sends people, nations and companies broke. My issue is that I don't believe that most people are prudent and give debt the respect it is due.
And for what passes as financial reporting in this country, the headlines are seemingly raging about how borrowers will save. Uh huh, how about a rate cut gives consumers a better opportunity reduce debt to a prudent level? Household debt is still at around 110% of income.
However, I am no economist so I defer to the RBA which has more resources and expertise than I, and probably most of us on this fine forum, to judge. Always keep in mind the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Keep smiling. In the end that could be the only thing you can do.
