by LainieJean » Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:18 am
A lot of them are not just property trusts, they are developers and managers as well (stapled securities, eg CNP, WDC, VPG, ALZ). A lot of companies that were once pure property trusts have gone this path, but some stapled ones are spinning off the property again, (eg CNP spinning off CER)
Some property trusts are buying offshore property as quality assets in Australia are geting more difficult to buy. Too many property trusts and property syndicates chasing them. The US component makes for higher risk, not only becasue they are relying on offshore expertise, but also because of currency differences. You can hedge a few years ahead, but after that you have to take the consequences of any major shifts.
For pure property trusts, the rents should go up with inflation and the value of the properties should go up to correspond so they give the same percentage return. This should give inflation protection for your capital plus a yield above the bond rate. This yield can be increased above the rental return if the property trust is leveraged.
Property developers are higher risk due to earnings being more dependent on higher risk ventures. TGP recently gave a profit warning and the share price plummeted in a spectacular way.
Property managers are generally quite stable and can increase in share price much more quickly than property trusts. eg CMW. Most of these are now part of stapled groups, however.
Cheers
LJ
Detail from The Crystal Ball painted by J W Waterhouse